Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Software Procurement by Federal standards is relatively straightforward

> FedRamp and FIPS compliance

It’s odd to see these in the same sentence. FedRAMP is so insanely complex/difficult to achieve in a straightforward way. Even by your own estimate for a series E startup (with lots of capital and the ability to spend >18 months< on compliance) there’s a 3M$ variation in cost.

That rules out every startup or SME in software and that’s why you have Palantir, half baked tech that rarely delivers/is somehow more universally hated in USG than ServiceNow. Yet able to seize the space and hike prices endlessly due to compliance being so difficult to achieve — they realize/accept this as their edge as well and it’s why they so aggressively pursued IL6.

The good news is that this is going away and USG is strongly reconsidering its approach here. CMMC, imo, is a huge step in the right direction.




> It’s odd to see these in the same sentence. FedRAMP is so insanely complex/difficult to achieve in a straightforward way

Agreed! Hence why I said "relatively". It's an easier procurement system than for other products in the Federal space.

> That rules out every startup or SME in software and that’s why you have Palantir

Tbf, Palantir's federal usage is kinda overstated from what I've heard from peers.

But yea, I agree, and made this point in another comment




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: